Description
Our opinions of and advice to the world. Updated whenever we get around to it.
Comments and suggestions can be sent to:
Dana - virtual_zero@hotmail.com
Bob - bobtheright@hotmail.com
Syndicate this site: Atom RSS
Latest Posts
Bush Holding Bin Laden - Bob
Quote of the day - Dana
Amnesty International can go to Hell - Dana
Has the Vatican lost it? - Dana
The U.N. is no help to Iraq - Dana
Saddam's Biggest Fans - Bob
Saddam's Latest Book - Dana
Things Found On Saddam - Bob
Ace Of Spades Captured - Bob
Document Links Saddam with 9/11 - Dana
Links
Our Sponsors
Miscellaneous
Privacy Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Friday, December 19, 2003
Ramesh Ponnuru over at The Corner writes:
There's something admirable about the doggedness of Richard Cohen's opposition to the death penalty, and his willingness to write a column arguing against executing Saddam Hussein. But there are three things I really dislike about this column.Point #3 is right on the spot.
1) "Along with such pariah nations as Sudan, the United States still executes children (under 18) and the mentally feeble -- and, inevitably, the innocent." I don't think that it can actually be demonstrated that the U.S. has executed an innocent man in 100 years, let alone that it regularly does so. But I'll take the "inevitably" as a way of softening the apparent empirical claim. But the U.S. executes the "mentally feeble"? Atkins v. Virginia (2002) forbids executing the mentally retarded. Unless Cohen is making some technical distinction between "mentally feeble" and retarded people, he's just wrong. And I'd figure someone who writes as much about capital punishment as Cohen to know about the 2002 case.
2) Lieberman's complaining about The Hague because it "sorely lacks a gallows, and for that matter a torture chamber." That's just a cheap shot.
3) "In the United States the right of the government to take life is almost universally accepted -- if not applauded. In Europe there is no such consensus. That's because in the past century, much of the continent suffered under fascist or communist governments that routinely murdered their own citizens, often 'legally.'" Let's pretend there's no implicit argument here on the order of the-Nazis-discouraged-smoking-so-discouraging-smoking-is-Nazi-like. Is this really the only explanation for the difference between American and European practices that comes to Cohen's mind? How about this: European countries are more disposed than America is to letting elites force through policies the populace doesn't like, and a sizable chunk of the populace is willing to revise its views after the fact. Maybe it has something to do with their experience of fascism, or their susceptibility to it.